Common intention in Indian law

The main ingredients of “acts done by several people in furtherance of a common intention”[1] are twofold: (1) there must be a criminal act committed by more than one person, (2) each act cumulatively resulting in the in the commission of the criminal offense must be been in furtherance of the common intention.[2] The jurisprudence of the Indian Supreme court has revealed further principles that apply when seeking to prove a common intention.[3] The common intention refers here to the ultimate crime intended thus each person need not commit each act, or even know of the others’ actions, so long as the intention to commit the ultimate crime is commonly intended.[4]

The common intention or plan may be proved either from conduct, circumstances or from incriminating facts.[5] Because direct proof of such an agreement is often unavailable intention can be inferred from circumstantial evidence.[6] This agreement must necessarily occur prior to the commission of the crime, although it can arise on the spur of the moment.[7] Common intention is a state of mind and can be inferred objectively from his conduct as well as from prior or subsequent attendant circumstances.[8] However, mere participation in the crime is not sufficient to attribute common intention.[9] Finally although these principles are important in establishing common intention in cases such as the instant case, it is not necessary to cite § 34 to obtain a conviction if the ingredients are present.[10]


[1] India Penal Code § 34. [IPC]

[2] Id.; Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2001 SC 1929: (2001) 4 SCC 193; Parasa Raja Manikyala Rao v. State of A.P. AIR 2004 SC 132; Girija Shankar v. State of U.P. AIR 2004 SC 1808.

[3] See Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), pp. 8-9 (2009).

[4] Nandu Rastogi alias Nandji Rastogi v. State of Bihar 2003 SCC (Cri) 177.

[5] Krishnan v. State AIR 2003 SC 2978: (2003) 7 SCC 56; Gopi Nath v. State of U.P. AIR 2001 SC 2493: (2001) 6 SCC 620.

[6] Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 8 (2009).

[7] Id.; Lallan Rai v. State of Bihar AIR 2003 SC 333: 2003 SCC (Cri) 301.

[8] Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab 2002 SCC (Cri) 1518.

[9] Id.

[10] Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2000 SC 2212: (2000) 4 SCC 603: 2000 SCC (Cri) 8555: 2000 Cr LJ 3462; see also Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 9 (2009).

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
  • RSS Women’s Rights News

    • Iran: Stop Woman’s Execution October 24, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email Iran’s judiciary should vacate the death sentence of Reyhaneh Jabbari and ensure that she receives a fair trial. She was convicted of murdering an older man in what she says was self defense. On September 29, 2014, prison authorities transferred Jabbari to a prison west of Tehran without explanation, raising fears that her ex […]
    • United Arab Emirates: Trapped, Exploited, Abused October 23, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email Migrant domestic workers in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are beaten, exploited, and trapped in forced labor situations, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The UAE government, about to take up an influential new role in the International Labour Organization (ILO), has failed to adequately protect female dome […]
    • US: Migrants Returned to Danger October 16, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email The 44-page report, “‘You Don’t Have Rights Here’: US Border Screening and Returns of Central Americans to Risk of Serious Harm,” details the US border policies and practices that place migrants at risk of serious harm back home, based on the accounts of people sent back to Honduras, people in detention, and an analysis of de […]
    • Afghanistan: Fight Rampant Sexual Harassment October 14, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email Afghanistan’s new government should take urgent steps to combat sexual harassment of women in education, employment, and public life. There are no laws in Afghanistan that specifically prohibit sexual harassment or protect victims. (New York) – Afghanistan’s new government should take urgent steps to combat sexual harassment […]
    • Bangladesh: Don’t Lower Marriage Age October 13, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email The Bangladeshi government should set 18 as the minimum age for marriage to comply with international prohibitions against child marriage. Recent media reports indicate the prime minister’s cabinet is considering a revision to the law to make 16 the minimum age of marriage for girls. The minimum age for men would be 18. (New […]