Common intention in Indian law

The main ingredients of “acts done by several people in furtherance of a common intention”[1] are twofold: (1) there must be a criminal act committed by more than one person, (2) each act cumulatively resulting in the in the commission of the criminal offense must be been in furtherance of the common intention.[2] The jurisprudence of the Indian Supreme court has revealed further principles that apply when seeking to prove a common intention.[3] The common intention refers here to the ultimate crime intended thus each person need not commit each act, or even know of the others’ actions, so long as the intention to commit the ultimate crime is commonly intended.[4]

The common intention or plan may be proved either from conduct, circumstances or from incriminating facts.[5] Because direct proof of such an agreement is often unavailable intention can be inferred from circumstantial evidence.[6] This agreement must necessarily occur prior to the commission of the crime, although it can arise on the spur of the moment.[7] Common intention is a state of mind and can be inferred objectively from his conduct as well as from prior or subsequent attendant circumstances.[8] However, mere participation in the crime is not sufficient to attribute common intention.[9] Finally although these principles are important in establishing common intention in cases such as the instant case, it is not necessary to cite § 34 to obtain a conviction if the ingredients are present.[10]


[1] India Penal Code § 34. [IPC]

[2] Id.; Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2001 SC 1929: (2001) 4 SCC 193; Parasa Raja Manikyala Rao v. State of A.P. AIR 2004 SC 132; Girija Shankar v. State of U.P. AIR 2004 SC 1808.

[3] See Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), pp. 8-9 (2009).

[4] Nandu Rastogi alias Nandji Rastogi v. State of Bihar 2003 SCC (Cri) 177.

[5] Krishnan v. State AIR 2003 SC 2978: (2003) 7 SCC 56; Gopi Nath v. State of U.P. AIR 2001 SC 2493: (2001) 6 SCC 620.

[6] Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 8 (2009).

[7] Id.; Lallan Rai v. State of Bihar AIR 2003 SC 333: 2003 SCC (Cri) 301.

[8] Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab 2002 SCC (Cri) 1518.

[9] Id.

[10] Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2000 SC 2212: (2000) 4 SCC 603: 2000 SCC (Cri) 8555: 2000 Cr LJ 3462; see also Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 9 (2009).

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
  • RSS Women’s Rights News

    • “Our Rights are Fundamental to Peace”
      Expand Sarah Jamal Ahmed, a 24-year-old sociologist who was one of the activists during the 2011 uprising in Sanaa, stands by posters of dead protesters posted in the streets. © 2012 Panos/Abbie Trayler-Smith The revolution made us proud to be there on the front line and men were forced to accept us. But now there are some who think it is time for women to g […]
    • Liesl Gerntholtz
      Liesl Gerntholtz is the executive director of the women's rights division. She is an expert on women's rights in Africa and has worked and written extensively on violence against women and HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa. Her work at Human Rights Watch has included documenting access to safe and legal abortion in Ireland and sexual and gender-based vio […]
    • Indonesia Begins to Roll Back Degrading Virginity Tests
      Indonesia said it will stop administering “virginity tests” to female aspiring civil servants as part of its admission process. The country’s Home Affairs Minister Tjahjo Kumolo announced this change—which will affect women working in government offices—on the heels of Human Rights Watch research that documented this degrading practice in the admission proce […]
    • How was Saudi Arabia Voted onto a UN Women’s Panel?
      On April 19, United Nations member states elected Saudi Arabia to serve on the UN Commission on the Status of Women, a body “dedicated to the promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of women.” But how does this repressive government deal with Saudi women who strive to achieve the commission’s own stated goals? Several days before the vote, Mariam al […]
    • Hope for Garment Workers with European Parliament’s Vote
      “Europeans should not wear clothes made by exploiting garment workers,” Lola Sanchez Caldentey, a member of the European Parliament, boldly declared yesterday. She was speaking at an event commemorating the victims of the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, when the eight-story building collapsed in Bangladesh, killing over 1,100 garment workers.  As the rapporteur of […]