Common intention in Indian law

The main ingredients of “acts done by several people in furtherance of a common intention”[1] are twofold: (1) there must be a criminal act committed by more than one person, (2) each act cumulatively resulting in the in the commission of the criminal offense must be been in furtherance of the common intention.[2] The jurisprudence of the Indian Supreme court has revealed further principles that apply when seeking to prove a common intention.[3] The common intention refers here to the ultimate crime intended thus each person need not commit each act, or even know of the others’ actions, so long as the intention to commit the ultimate crime is commonly intended.[4]

The common intention or plan may be proved either from conduct, circumstances or from incriminating facts.[5] Because direct proof of such an agreement is often unavailable intention can be inferred from circumstantial evidence.[6] This agreement must necessarily occur prior to the commission of the crime, although it can arise on the spur of the moment.[7] Common intention is a state of mind and can be inferred objectively from his conduct as well as from prior or subsequent attendant circumstances.[8] However, mere participation in the crime is not sufficient to attribute common intention.[9] Finally although these principles are important in establishing common intention in cases such as the instant case, it is not necessary to cite § 34 to obtain a conviction if the ingredients are present.[10]


[1] India Penal Code § 34. [IPC]

[2] Id.; Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2001 SC 1929: (2001) 4 SCC 193; Parasa Raja Manikyala Rao v. State of A.P. AIR 2004 SC 132; Girija Shankar v. State of U.P. AIR 2004 SC 1808.

[3] See Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), pp. 8-9 (2009).

[4] Nandu Rastogi alias Nandji Rastogi v. State of Bihar 2003 SCC (Cri) 177.

[5] Krishnan v. State AIR 2003 SC 2978: (2003) 7 SCC 56; Gopi Nath v. State of U.P. AIR 2001 SC 2493: (2001) 6 SCC 620.

[6] Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 8 (2009).

[7] Id.; Lallan Rai v. State of Bihar AIR 2003 SC 333: 2003 SCC (Cri) 301.

[8] Harjit Singh v. State of Punjab 2002 SCC (Cri) 1518.

[9] Id.

[10] Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab AIR 2000 SC 2212: (2000) 4 SCC 603: 2000 SCC (Cri) 8555: 2000 Cr LJ 3462; see also Justice M.R. Mallick, Criminal Manual (Criminal Major Acts) Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), p. 9 (2009).

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
  • RSS Women’s Rights News

    • Canada: Growing Outrage but Business as Usual January 29, 2015
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email New police data developed during 2014 show that more than 1,100 indigenous women and girls have disappeared or been murdered in Canada since 1980, double an earlier estimate. The Canadian government has resisted calls for a national inquiry into the violence, and instead has opted for half-measures that do little to address t […]
    • UAE: Repression on All Fronts January 29, 2015
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email The UAE authorities in 2014 aggressively restricted the rights of freedom of expression, association, and assembly, cracking down on dissidents and anyone considered a threat to national security, Human Rights Watch said today in its World Report 2015. The authorities also failed to investigate credible allegations that secur […]
    • Lebanon: Laws Discriminate Against Women January 19, 2015
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email Lebanon’s religion-based personal status laws discriminate against women across the religious spectrum and don’t guarantee their basic rights, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. Lebanon has 15 separate personal status laws for its recognized religions but no civil code covering issues such as divorce, propert […]
    • Nepal: Independence Critical for Justice Panels December 18, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email The Nepal government should ensure more victim participation and improve transparency when selecting candidates for two independent commissions on the country’s decade-long conflict, eight local and international human rights organizations and conflict-era victims groups said in an open letter to Prime Minister Sushil Koirala […]
    • India: Women With Disabilities Locked Away and Abused December 3, 2014
      Tweet Widget Facebook Like Email (New Delhi) – Women and girls with disabilities in India are forced into mental hospitals and institutions, where they face unsanitary conditions, risk physical and sexual violence, and experience involuntary treatment, including electroshock therapy,Human Rights Watch said today. As one woman put it, they are “treated worse […]